Base44 pricing starts with a free plan. Base44’s public pricing page lists annual-billing equivalents of $16 a month for Starter, $40 for Builder, $80 for Pro, and $160 for the displayed Elite package, checked October 12, 2026. Those figures describe a subscription paid annually; they are not month-to-month contract prices.
For a supplier portal or internal inventory app, add the cost of preparing business records, testing access, and supporting the workflow after launch. Permute publishes this breakdown and sells connected business data and custom software with implementation support. Use the same app scope when comparing a builder subscription with a delivered application.
Published plans and annual commitments
The allowances below come from Base44’s pricing page. Annual totals are calculated as the displayed monthly equivalent multiplied by twelve, before taxes or negotiated terms. Confirm the selected package at checkout, particularly for higher-volume plans.
| Plan | Monthly equivalent, billed annually | Calculated annual subscription | Message / integration credits per month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | $0 | 25 / 100 |
| Starter | $16 | $192 | 100 / 2,000 |
| Builder | $40 | $480 | 250 / 10,000 |
| Pro | $80 | $960 | 500 / 20,000 |
| Elite, displayed package | $160 | $1,920 | 1,200 / 50,000 |
Base44’s billing documentation also describes Business and Enterprise plans. Business adds organizational controls including SSO, publishing controls, and connector governance; Enterprise adds controls including SCIM and audit monitoring. Check the current package and quote when those requirements determine your purchase.
Choose the required capabilities before sizing the allowance. A team can have light usage but still need an organizational control unavailable in its proposed package. Write that control into the purchase requirements, with an owner who will configure and test it.
Separate building credits from app usage
Base44’s credit documentation separates message credits used while building from integration credits used by built-in services when an app runs. Message consumption varies with the work performed. A credit allowance therefore cannot be translated into a guaranteed number of completed features.
The same documentation says allowances are shared across a workspace, unused credits expire at reset, and credit-consuming actions pause when the applicable limit is reached. Some charges vary by workspace. Measure representative actions in your own usage view before estimating a production month.
For a supplier onboarding app, separate changes made by the builder from submissions made by suppliers. Adding a new field and processing a submitted document are different activities. Record how often each occurs and which services the submission invokes, including any email or AI step.
Prompts and revisions
Measured app activity
Data and access changes
Estimate usage from a completed workflow
Run a representative supplier submission from start to finish using test records. Inspect the measured usage, then repeat with a rejected document and a corrected submission. A budget based only on the successful path misses the work created by incomplete forms and repeated processing.
Use observed credits per completed workflow multiplied by expected workflow volume as an initial estimate. Keep assumptions visible: the number of submissions, the mix of document sizes, and whether notifications repeat. Add a separate estimate for development activity instead of treating every month as another initial build.
Assign a person to inspect usage and decide what happens near a limit. Your operating procedure should identify which work can wait and how employees discover an interrupted action. A pending submission must remain distinguishable from one accepted into the supplier record.
Explore connected business data
Inspect how approved records and shared definitions can support an internal app.
Add data preparation and delivery to the subscription
An app that combines NetSuite supplier records with an Excel onboarding register needs a rule for matching the same supplier in both. Decide how to handle separate legal entities, old vendor codes, and missing identifiers. A displayed total needs a defined scope before anyone can compare it with the purchasing report.
Ask for an implementation estimate covering source access, mapping, calculations, permission tests, and release review. Include the handling of a failed refresh and an employee losing access. The enterprise app development process provides a way to assign those responsibilities before launch.
Name the maintenance owner and the event that starts paid support work. A renamed source field, a revised approval rule, and an expired credential can each require attention after the interface is finished. Put the response expectation and the included work into the delivery agreement.
Compare the same application across options
Give each option the same acceptance requirements: permitted users, connected sources, required actions, and a record that can be traced to its origin. Ask who supplies the implementation and who keeps it running. Comparing only subscription prices leaves those responsibilities unpriced.
If you are choosing between builders, use Base44 vs Lovable for business apps to compare the development and operating model. Keep the pricing worksheet separate from the acceptance checklist so a discount does not obscure a missing requirement.
Permute: scope the connected application
Permute sells connected business data and custom software with implementation support. We connect approved sources, reconcile records, and implement the definitions your team approves. Your developers or our engineers can build an application around that prepared data, with access limited by current permissions.
For a purchasing manager, the result can be a supplier review that uses the same supplier identities and delivery definitions as the management report. Source references let the reviewer inspect the records behind an exception. The custom software offering describes how engineering delivery and reusable data fit together.
Request a scope covering connections, business rules, app delivery, and support. Compare that estimate with the builder subscription plus the people and services required to deliver the same result. Keep the definition of a completed workflow consistent in both estimates.
Confirm hosting and action requirements before purchase
Permute app hosting is in early access for externally compiled static frontends. Builds and source editing take place outside Permute, and a general server runtime is outside that hosting scope. Confirm availability and deployment requirements for the proposed application.
Any action that changes a system of record needs a separately verified, permissioned execution path. A connected source does not establish support for every write operation. Have the delivery owner demonstrate the exact action and its approval behavior before treating it as included.
Choose a Base44 plan from the controls and measured usage your application requires. Translate the annual display price into the commitment you will pay, then add implementation and support. Test a completed workflow, including rejected submissions and access changes. Approve the budget when those costs and responsibilities are explicit.
Price one finished business app
Review the source records, access rules, and delivery work for a focused application.
Questions about budgeting for Base44
Should we commit annually before the pilot?
Use a pilot to establish the required controls and usage pattern first. Compare the annual commitment with the flexibility of a shorter contract, including the possibility that the proposed app changes scope. A discounted rate is useful only when the selected package fits the work.
Who should approve the app budget?
Have the business owner approve the workflow and the technical owner approve access and maintenance responsibilities. Finance can then evaluate a defined subscription and delivery scope. An unassigned support obligation should remain an open item in the budget.
What should we budget when another source is added?
Estimate the work to obtain access, match records, and check the existing calculations against the new scope. Re-run the permission tests for the affected users. Reuse completed work where it fits, while keeping the new source’s acceptance criteria visible.